First, I think it is best to look at this cheat sheet that describes what countries are represented by what food stuffs. Kimchi is South Korea and dumplings are North Korea for example, and the U.S. has several fried foods attributed to it. Then watch the video:
Thursday, February 28, 2008
A history of war through food
First, I think it is best to look at this cheat sheet that describes what countries are represented by what food stuffs. Kimchi is South Korea and dumplings are North Korea for example, and the U.S. has several fried foods attributed to it. Then watch the video:
Monday, February 25, 2008
Surgery and Anesthesiology
Mark Penn Doomed Hillary Clinton
The Washington Post has a piece up that was written almost 10 months ago in late April 2007 that in hindsight is a road map to the dismal place Hillary finds herself today. His strategy of inevitability was basically to ignore the others, and charge through to the nomination. But being from a large and successful background in the corporate world, he failed to understand that politics is inherently fluid and when his poll-proven-plan™ of "go ahead and win" was challenged by someone new, Barack Obama, he had nothing left to give but the silly and unprofessional kind of attacks we are seeing today. Here are some choice quotes from the article:
If Clinton seems cautious, it may be because Penn has made caution a science, repeatedly testing issues to determine which ones are safe and widely agreed upon (he was part of the team that encouraged Clinton's husband to run on the issue of school uniforms in 1996).
If Clinton sounds middle-of-the-road, it may be because Penn is a longtime pollster for the centrist Democratic Leadership Council whose clients have included Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.).
If Clinton resembles a Washington insider with close ties to the party's biggest donors, it may be because her lead strategist is a wealthy chief executive who heads a giant public relations firm, where he personally hones Microsoft's image in Washington.
And if some opponents see Clinton as arrogant, her campaign a coronation rather than a grass-roots movement, it may be because of the numbers wizard guiding her campaign and the PowerPoint presentations he likes to give on the inevitability of his candidate.
...
As recently as the 2004 presidential contest, Penn argued that Democrats would lose if they failed to close the "security gap." His client list includes prominent backers of the Iraq war, particularly Lieberman, whose presidential campaign Penn helped run in 2004, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, whose campaign he advised when Blair won a historic third term in 2005.Not to the lay the blame entirely on Penn (and hindsight is 20/20), Hillary chose the use him to advocate for her message because he is "tough" and has been effective in the past with people like Bill Clinton, Joe Lieberman, Tony Blair, and he won her a senate seat in NY. And it was one of my first reasons why I started moving towards Obama and away from Hillary. She has so many strengths, and I very much like her wonkish devotion to policies and and the processes of good government. But, I figured that something was wrong if anyone thought it was a good idea to trust some one like Mark Penn with running your campaign. And Hillary did.
...
Penn's theory of the 2008 race has always been that after two tumultuous terms under Bush, the electorate will want change -- but not too much change. Clinton offers a perfect mix, Penn believes. She inherently represents change, as a woman, without being unfamiliar or untested, thanks to her many years in Washington.
And this is why I think scripted Hillary sounds so stiff and often awkward, while debate/unscripted Hillary sounds so sharp and poised. She bought in to Mark Penn because she really thought he could win the nomination for her and that somehow she wasn't good enough by herself. I think the opposite was true, but at this point it is far too late for second guessing. The cracks in her campaign's foundation were set a long time ago, and there no time left to fix them as the nomination slips farther and farther away from reach.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Pros and cons
Well how about that
The one regulating dangerous dogs, HF2906, would give animal control authorities more power to hold the owners of dangerous dogs accountable.
Bill Forbes, with the Minnesota Animal Control Association, had this to say about it.
"Currently we have a law that doesn't really do a lot to the [owner of] dangerous dogs, its the dog itself that generally pays the maximum penalty. The [owner of] dangerous dogs goes out and gets another dogs after his dog is ordered destroyed and starts with a clean slate, which is not the issue."
He said that owners of dangerous dogs are primarily men, and the dogs are usually not trained or socialized properly and are often chained up outside, which he said causes the dogs to be aggressive.
A "dangerous dog" is defined as one that has a reported history of attacking people or other animals. Rep. John Lesch (DFL-St. Paul) offered an amendment that would have banned certain breeds of dog, such as Rottweiler’s, Pit Bulls and wolf hybrids, but it was not adopted into the bill [emphasis added].
So.... there we go. Hooray!
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
When some one is wrong on the internet...
Who will defeat them!
From the always nerdy web comic xkcd
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Animal myths #3
- Myth #6: According to physics, bumblebees shouldn't be able to fly.
- Myth #7: The skulls of [insert skinny-headed breed here] are too narrow for their brains, so when they reach 4 or 5 years old, they go crazy and get so aggressive they kill their owners.
On a physiological level, let's consider what happens when your brain swells (i.e. you have severe head trauma). Pressure in the brain means pressure on neurons, which can cause them to not function and eventually die. Anything that increases intracranial pressure is bad news, and depending on the severity, you could see things like general mental dullness, seizures, ataxia (inability to walk), or other neurological signs like twitching eyes or loss of balance. If the pressure isn't relieved, it eventually leads to permanent brain damage and death. The brain controls a lot of things besides behavior, and an increased tendency towards violence would probably not be the first thing you'd see.
Lastly, if narrow skulls really caused aggressive behavior, how come you never hear this myth applied to collies?
Monday, February 18, 2008
One more year
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Happy Birthday Aria!
She is I think the most fragile little thing I have ever seen in my life. I was brave though and held her, and once she was there she was just as snug as can be. I am happy we share 1/2 birthdays - hers being Aug 14th and mine being today! She will be going home in a few days once Natasha has recovered. Then it is life with little Aria! She makes me realllly want to move back to the city now. A baby just changes everything huh?Understatement? And she is not so fragile any more! Running around like a monster grabbing everything she can. So Happy Birthday! We love you! Hurrah!
Bond, your car is ready
Ok lets see what do we need to make it a true bond car?
- Lotus Elise? Check
- Driver-less functionality? Check
- Floats? Check
- Submarine? Check
- Maneuvers underwater? Check
- On board SCUBA system? Check
- All electric? Check.
- Missie launchers? Errr, well no but you might be able to fit those on the real version.
The question of course is this useful at all. Well, in the event that you are being chased by a villain and need to loose them fast, is there any better way than to drive in the canals of Venice? Or Between desert islands? I didn' think so.
Below is the video of the thing in action. Skip ahead to see their chubby James Bond take it into and then under the water.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Famous girl!
Chris: Fun fact, The Daily Puppy gets about 37,000 page views a day acording to Alexa. :D
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Westminster, day 2
Sporting group: Weimaraner, Ch Colsidex Seabreeze Perfect Fit ("Marge")
Toy group: Toy poodle, Ch Smash JP Win A Victory ("Vikki")
...... and Best In Show, which by all odds should have gone to one of the poodles, goes to....
Uno the beagle! Congratulations, Uno, on being the first beagle to make it to Best of Group at Westminster since 1939, and the first beagle to make Best In Show ever! Arrroooo!
Winning corgi
Winnie approves of the choice of a tricolor corgi, but says that she has much prettier ears.
Either way, congratulations Tina!
EDIT:
Here is the video of the Corgi group. Enjoy!
Monday, February 11, 2008
Eye on Westminster
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Hard week, relaxing weekend
On Friday, I spent the day listening to Dr. Bernie Rollin, one of the best-known veterinary and animal ethicists in the world. I'm not sure what I expected him to look or sound like, but I certainly wasn't expecting a massive bearded weight-lifting motorcycle-riding Jewish New Yorker-turned-Colorado-ranch-owner. He started his talk with a statement that he doesn't care who he offends, because if you're offended that means he made you think. He then proceeded to say things that would have offended someone in most categories of society, including choosing me as an example of a young person who, since I was raised in a technology-laden society, has no idea how to read, write, research, use a library, or think on my own. Thankfully he was colorful and interesting enough to pull off most of his offensive statements as part of a larger ethical discussion (and he's right, you think a lot more about something that offends you than something you agree with).
Anyway, he certainly ruffled some feathers, but I think that was his point. After all, if you aren't offended, you haven't really been forced to think, right?
... but I really can read, write, research, use a library, and think on my own ;)
Thursday, February 07, 2008
Hooray!
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Political Dogs
Megan was going to write about this, but she is in the middle of a crazy week at school so she forwarded it to me. It is from the Baltimore Sun blog on dogs "Mutts" and it a section called, "If candidates were dogs."
Ron Paul wins Winnie's vote - he is a Corgi. Hillary Clinton is Labradoodle, Barack Obama is a Great Dane, John McCain is a Pug, Mitt Romney is a Smooth Fox Terrier (awesome) and Mike Huckabee is a Beagle. Click the link for the entire list.
Personally, I think Mike Gravel is off, and while McCain does look like a pug I don't think the description fits. People on-line said he was a pit-bull ('because he is so tough!') but that doesn't fit either. He is not a very aggressive partisan fighter and quite aloof to many in his party. He is not very loyal to his party and enjoys his maverick status...
Wait a minute, I think I got it! It explains everything. Why do republicans distrust him even though he has a normally conservative voting record? Why can't the establishment get behind him?
It is because John McCain isn't even a dog, he is a cat!
What does it all mean?
1: An Obama-Clinton or a Clinton-Obama ticket.
Things are so close, and so many people are going to vote for one of these people that I can't see the party ultamatly being able to make a clear-cut choice. In fact, I have read several prominent writers say that they voted for Obama but were happy to see Hillary do well too. People want change, but they don't want to bail on Hillary who they have been personally defending for years and years. And even by convention time, I doubt either candidate will have the numbers to win but then again I don't think it will be a tie making the winner President, and second place the VP. This all comes with the assumption that the race stays as clean as it has been since South Carolina which is by no means a guarantee.
2: McCain-Huckabee?
I think Mitt "Mittens" Romney is just burning money at this point, and Huckabee did better than any one thought. Again. He is a dark horse but I knew he had legs! He is just such a nice folksy guy that even I genuinely like him in a strange way. But he is never going to win. He is a southern candidate and only broke out in Iowa. But this pseudo three way race is really bad for Republicans whos main factions came together under George Bush - Military, Fiscal, and Social. Now you have the Military conservative McCain the soon to be nominee, the social conservative Huckabee, and the fiscal conservative Romney all at odds. A McCain-Huckabee ticket at least attempts to fix the most dangerous break in the party, and every one assumes the 'sensible'fiscal conservatives' will come along (begrudgingly) for the ride anyway. Watch out for this ticket, it is stronger that it appears.
3: This is going to take a long time. The Democratic National Convention is in Denver, August 25th-28th.
The day after
From the New York Times, here is what is coming next:
Feb 9 Louisiana
Feb 9 Nebraska (D)
Feb 9 Virgin Islands (D)
Feb 9 Washington
Feb 10 Maine (D)
Feb 12 District of Columbia
Feb 12 Maryland
Feb 12 Virginia
Feb 19 Hawaii (D)
Feb 19 Wisconsin
Mar 4 Ohio
Mar 4 Rhode Island
Mar 4 Texas
Mar 4 Vermont
Mar 8 Wyoming (D)
Mar 11 Mississippi
And beyond. Think we will make it to April?
Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Caucus!
For our little sub-section (Go W-4 P-03!) Obama won with 357 votes to Clinton's 128.
And as I am writing, they are calling MN for Obama. And with 36% reporting, it looks like it will be by quite a margin!
EDIT:
Via NPR, turnout on the Dem side: 150,00 - 200,000
Previous record: 75,000 in 1968 for Hubert Humphrey.
"The Democrats' Choice: Manager or Visionary"
But [Hillary] largely accepts the circumstances, or at least her inability to change them through the application of her own charisma. Obama, by contrast, focuses more on changing the circumstances in which the legislation is made. The promise of his presidency is less its capacity to change our policies than its capacity to change our politics. He is the more likely to address, forcefully and eloquently, a culture that accepts grotesque CEO pay and rampant inequality. She is more likely to push workable solutions aimed at curbing those blights. She promises to ride the bureaucracy; he promises to drive the mood. He promises to replace Reagan's vision of an individualistic economy with the progressive dream of an interconnected economy; she promises to work tirelessly to redress the inequities of our current economy. She promises to care for our economy; he promises to change its values. She wants to be the more liberal Clinton; he wants to be remembered as the progressive Reagan. To choose between them requires not so much an analysis of their policies as a judgment call on our politics. It requires deciding whether our country needs a talented steward or a visionary.
Caucus in Minnesota!
Everything will take place from 6:30 - 8:00 tonight and there are two parts (for Democrats at least). The first is voting for the national party candidate and that takes just a few moments. All you have to do to vote is give them your address, and sign your name asserting that you will be 18 by Nov. 4th 2008. It just takes a few minutes and you can choose to leave.
The second is really a Caucus, and that will decide delegates for MN Senate campaign. After that, it is any resolutions for the state platform to be voted on during the state convention. This will take place from 7:00-8:00.
This is a unique primary for Minnesota, in that our votes really matter. In 2004, it was John Kerry and John Edwards but Edwards dropped out of the race just a few minutes after the caucus was over and Kerry was the effective nominee. This time however, it looks very likely that there will be no nominee by the convention, meaning that every delegate matters. And the difference between your delegate going to Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton could be a few hundred votes.
We will see how it all plays out. I think Obama needs to lose by less that 100 delegates to stay alive, tie to keep his momentum, and any kind of win would surge him ahead. But there are so many variables that you might as well be betting on the super bowl!
Tonights Polling Gap
Zogby has Obama up by 13 points in California.
SurveyUSA has Hillary up by 10 points in California.
Both have about the same sample size, and the same time frame. Thats a 23 point spread!
Monday, February 04, 2008
Superbowl!
Oh my god indeed.
But how about the ads? My favorite three are as follows:
1: Audi R8. Yes it really does sound like that.
2: Bud Light/"Super Pro" proving again that all you have to do is point a camera at Will Ferrell and it will probably be funny.
3:Bridgestone. Extra points for the screaming bug.
EDIT: Forgot this one for Tide:
Saturday, February 02, 2008
Obama!
I will try to post some video clips too.
But the crowd was wild, the speech was amazing, and I am very tired from standing in one spot for 5 hours. At least we didn't have to stand outside!
Obama 08!